You and people like you are a cancer on this game.

Go play some brainless console shooter or something and leave EVE to the people who want to play EVE and not the hisec baby game.

Guristas agent in VFK so I can farm crystal sets without going to venal tia

My agenda is to grow EvE's player base and make its markets liquid. Simple and clear like water.

Edit: "grow player base" means an increased chance at statistically getting suitable people for whatever gameplay you like. It also means letting CCP hire more staff to create more content and more fixes.

I don't hide behind manifestos, I don't sit behind idiosynchrasies (like: the richest and largest alliance calling for buffs that will directly make them even stronger), I don't spam dozens of threads all about impairing somebody else, I don't coordinate 3rd party blogs to instill an ideology on the general playerbase.

Way to miss the point. The point is you have to have some sort of social interaction (diplomacy) to be successful in lower sec status areas but do not in highsec. Yet for some unknown reason highsec industrial capabilities should not be nerfed even though it requires no social interaction, (diplomacy) in fact people are touting that highsec industrial activity should be more rewarding. This is analogous to saying solo play should be more rewarding than group play in an MMO which is not true at all. Once again CCP has acknowledged this when they say people who find corporations (social groups) they like are far more likely to stay in EVE than people who do not find corporations (social groups) they like.

Your confusion arises from your inexplicable need to spazz around a thread picking different quotes at seeming random instead of attempting to find a narrative in what people are saying that inform the contexts of each quote you pick.

I am not actually writing this response for your sake, as you will just chop it up and barf out 4 or 5 nonresponsive and somewhat to completely spastic comments that will in no way further any form of discourse as known by man. However, other people read this, so I will take the opportunity to further clarify these points for them.

The complaint is that nullsec is lacking the guts of day to day gameplay that facilitates content creation, the gameplay that gets people logging in, in space, and interacting. This core gameplay is what is then used by leaders to create higher order content. Nullsec has so far survived just because the experience was novel, so it was easier for content-creators to create a narrative for their people. Now the same old story is getting tired, and they need the gaping holes in gameplay to be filled.

Hisec, on the other hand, is lacking the freedom of action to take the abundant lowlevel canned gameplay and create something greater out of it. This is because people have no need whatsoever to plant a flag of any sort, so there is no way to create content over the attack or defense of property there, as no property is actually vulnerable.

Yeah who could forget all those attempts that CCP have made to "push people out" of hi sec. 3 CONCORD buffs, 2 increases to hi-sec belt spawn rates, raising all agents to +20 Quality, Incursions, Crimewatch, removing drone alloys, the mining barge buff, a bounty system, war-dec nerfs - WHEN WILL THIS BRUTAL PERSECUTION OF HI-SEC STOP???

I'm not disagreeing with you (although what lo-sec has to do with it I'm not sure), I'm just saying that hi-sec has received repeated significant buffs over the last 2-3 years.

You... you are joking, right? No one is seriously this dumb in real life, surely?

I see your point and I disagree.

If you have a nice quiet farm where you are gently working there's gonna be a **** ton of people who want to rush in there and smash it up.

That's kinda the point, give people the opportunity to have a cool farm of their own on condition they fight off all comers who want to take it for themselves. It's basically king of the hill, you can be king but don't think someone isn't eyeing up your land for a takeover.

That's the space opera beauty of a big null sec industrial base, it will become so political, so alive, you will have to use every tool in your arsenal to survive. If they made it vulnerable to small gangs (maybe a small gang can turn off your auto harvester for 24 hours, something like that) then there would be a constant cat and mouse, raider and militia, game going on all over the place.

Pirates could make a living in null just raiding the fields and the alliances would have to chase them off.
There is nothing in Null to fight over.

So yeah, even if it's one system per player and we can farm all day and make ISK there'll always be people flying two systems over to smash your greenhouse, for no better reason than kicks.

One of the reasons it's so broken at the moment is only a giant fleet can really hurt someone, so those who have giant fleets prosper and those who don't disappear and go and live in wormholes.

Solo, small gang, these are the things a proper null industry could bring back, and bring back in style like they've never been seen before, as James 315 says, a PVP food chain needs herbivores. (And don't give me the "ah hah, it was just about trying to shoot newbs crap", I mean proper players who want to do their industry in null and live on their own strength).

This is the giant, amazing, space opera CCP wants, it's what is in the trailers, they just need to have the guts to see it thought. To give it space to exist.

Pretty sure undeccability is like the CONCORD npc protection, it's something you must buff constantly because otherwise people will unsub and EVE will die.

The true nature of EVE is afking with NPCs protecting you from any consequences of your idiocy or the like. By the way, buff freighter EHP.